The Comprehensive Plan Update process was kicked off by tapping into the thoughts of the City's elected and appointed officials. The goal of this leadership meeting was to set some guiding principles for the planning process and build a shared foundation for the City's strengths and weaknesses today. This meeting included two activities that invited attendees to participate and give their input on the process.


Activity 1: Guiding Principles

Guiding principles are statements that will be used to direct strategies in the comprehensive update to ensure they align with the community’s values. They are a very broad framework that allow for a lot of flexibility (as the update process is dynamic and ongoing) but also act as the first step toward focusing in on what the community needs from the update process.

The first activity asked participants to help shape and refine the guiding principles for the 2026 Comprehensive Plan Update. Participants considered several guiding principle ideas that were categorized across four broader categories: Community and Social Values, Economy and Infrastructure, Environmental Stewardship, and Governance and Planning. Each participant had five votes and were able to disperse their votes however they wished. Following the initial voting, participants split into groups to further discuss the principles and adjust and refine them.

Each small group reported out their top guiding principles to the larger group and consensus was built around the following six:

  1. Preserve local heritage and natural landscapes.
  2. Base decisions on data, evidence, and best practices.
  3. Encourage civic participation.
  4. Protect natural resources and green spaces.
  5. Ensure infrastructure is reliable, efficient, and sustainable.
  6. Maintain flexibility to adapt as community needs change.

The detailed results of this process are available below.


Activity 2: Strengths and Weaknesses.

One way for a community to start thinking about and discussing future planning strategies is by brainstorming Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT). This process is a way for people to start thinking about ideas and it is often done more than once during the update process as it evolves and becomes more focused. The second activity at the kick-off meeting ended the night with a preliminary brainstorm about the strengths and weaknesses of the community. Participants were each given 10 sticky notes, five for strengths and five for weaknesses. They were asked to give their input on what they felt the community did well or what they wanted to enhance or protect (strengths) and then elements that they felt were missing or could be improved (weaknesses). Participants then placed their sticky note input on the wall and categorized them by topic. These notes were collected and compiled into their sorted topics to determine common themes amongst the comments.

The detailed results of this process are available below.

Activity Results

Guiding Principles

Strengths


Small

Small Size
Small-scale businesses
L.V. is a small bedroom community centering in tradition & walkability that goes back to the 1930s
Small community
Small community
Small community feel - local municipality and political representation


City Services

Garbage and regular leaves pickup
Great leaf collection
Garbage & regular leaves pickup


Growth

Growing community
New development districts
Growing in a positive direction


Government

Educated city ocuncil
Educated electorate
DDA
Good historical commission and society
Hardworking City Council
City staff & City Council area available to residents
Leadership


Natural Features

Parks
Municipal park and Children's Garden
Trees and greenspaces
Greenspaces
Resiliency
Walkability though biased towards recreation areas
Trees
Greenspaces
Excellent urban forest & wildlife
Trees
Tree committee
Wildlife
Feral cat rescue & TNR


Community

Friendly people
Close community
Sense of community
Family and pet friendly
Proud community "Feels like home"
Great people
Community
Strong sense of community
Engaged and caring residents
Kind neighbors who support eachother
Volunteers
Involved community members
Progressive values
New residents show an interest in L.V. history and hope for preservation in the future


Location

Accessibility
Geographic location
Central location
Central location in metro Detroit
Central geographic location
Easy to access other areas; Downtown, northern suburbs, and east suburbs
Location
Centralized
Central location. Easy to get downtown, or to Novi, or Bimingham
Easy to get around (via car)
Location to Metro Detroit and surrounding neighborhoods
Location
Location and variety of businesses


Character & Atmosphere

Walkable neighborhoods
Beautiful homes and neighborhood
Architectural heritage
Residential community first
Curb appeal
Beautiful homes
Architectural diversity / houses
Diverse classic architecture in the neighborhoods
Character of homes / neighborhoods
Housing stock
Beautful homes and streets
Quiet/tranquil (depending on the day and time) on Lathrup Blvd. Architectural quality and diversity
Variety of homes on tree-lined streets
Great neighborhoods
Beautiful homes and gardens
Not a grid, not a cul-de-sac
Pride of ownership, well-maintained properties
Large residential properties
District architecture
Historical character
commitment to historic preservation
Peacefulness
Neighborhood feel


Safety

Safety
Low crime statistics suggest lower than nearby safe communities
Our own police department
Public safety


Events & Activities

Community engagement activities
City Activities
Community Activities
Community Events
I like the LVMF (music festival) bringing people together


Diversity

Diverse area
Diversity
Diveristy
Diveristy
Demographic diversity
Population diversity
Population diversity / acceptance
Diversity & acceptance
Diveristy
Diverse culture of residence
Community diversity
Diversity of neighbors

Weaknesses


Aging Infrastructure

Electric grid
Roads need to be fixed
Water system needs updating
Aging and unmaintained drainage infrastructure
Infrastructure, specifically sewer drainage in back yards
Stormwater management could be vastly improved via green infrastructure and strategic plantings
Lack of modern technology/current technology


Government Finance

Irresponsible employee salaries and perks
No sources of city revenue
High property taxes
Fiscal instability
Spending out of control
High taxes
Irresponsible spending, not revenue problem
City Council needs to be more fiscally responsible
Revenue growth challenges. City is built out.
Lack of or reduce revenue sharing
Limited economic growth
No new build out space


Identity & Commercial Development

Trying to make a "walkable" downtown. The city was never meant to have a "downtown".
Downtown development, no vision
Too many of the same businesses
Lack of business diversity
Characterless Southfield Road
Limited sit down restaurants
Unoccupied business frontage
Missing some amenities of a self-sufficient / contained city (groceries)
No Mexican restaurant in city
Lack of diversity in restaurants
Lack of identity as separate from Southfield
Not enough "Welcome to Lathrup Village" Signage (and signage in general)
Ugly main corridors
Overly restrictive zoning


Division by Infrastructure

Traffic speeding through
Divided neighborhoods
Divided by quadrants
Southfield Rd. & 696 separating the community
Connecting the four quadrants
Highways split into quarters
No speed humps (Lathrup Blvd)
Southfield Road
The big divides: Southfield Rd. & 696 Service drive
Hard to get around on foot, bike, or other non-motorized transportation


Community Outlook

Lack of broad civic participation
Divisiveness
Vicious online critics of everything
Short-sightedness of some residents
Openess to change
Adaptability to change
Trivial and petty complaints
People who don't appreciate the work of the mayor and council
Divisiveness online / social media
Hyper critical residents/complainers


Preservation

One postage stamp park for kids. Lathrup School will soon be lost forever leading to unhealthy helicopter parenting in lieu of an independent childhood.
Lack of respect for historic preservation. L.V. City Council & Historic District Commission. Loss of heritage and lack of support for L.V.'s traditional clubs & their charitable activities - a death of L.V.'s Lions Club in 2025 after 68 yrs


Parks

Neglected parks
Parks are outdated
Lack of participation in P & R
Unimpressive parks
Parks equipment not safe (older)
Lack of money for parks / greenspaces
Poor maintenance of City Hall park property
Insufficient maintenance of parks and city-owned grounds and greenspaces / parks
Lots of low-quality greenspaces - need more care and attention given to managing for quality habitat

Private Property Maintenance

Code enforcement
Tree maintenance responsibility of residents


Government to Resident Communication

Getting notice to everyone at once
lack of effective communication networks
communicating with residents
Proactive outreach for residents on costs / assessments
Non-transparent governance


Schools

Schools

Presentation