The Comprehensive Plan Update process was kicked off by tapping into the thoughts of the City's elected and appointed officials. The goal of this leadership meeting was to set some guiding principles for the planning process and build a shared foundation for the City's strengths and weaknesses today. This meeting included two activities that invited attendees to participate and give their input on the process.
Activity 1: Guiding Principles
Guiding principles are statements that will be used to direct strategies in the comprehensive update to ensure they align with the community’s values. They are a very broad framework that allow for a lot of flexibility (as the update process is dynamic and ongoing) but also act as the first step toward focusing in on what the community needs from the update process.
The first activity asked participants to help shape and refine the guiding principles for the 2026 Comprehensive Plan Update. Participants considered several guiding principle ideas that were categorized across four broader categories: Community and Social Values, Economy and Infrastructure, Environmental Stewardship, and Governance and Planning. Each participant had five votes and were able to disperse their votes however they wished. Following the initial voting, participants split into groups to further discuss the principles and adjust and refine them.
Each small group reported out their top guiding principles to the larger group and consensus was built around the following six:
- Preserve local heritage and natural landscapes.
- Base decisions on data, evidence, and best practices.
- Encourage civic participation.
- Protect natural resources and green spaces.
- Ensure infrastructure is reliable, efficient, and sustainable.
- Maintain flexibility to adapt as community needs change.
The detailed results of this process are available below.
Activity 2: Strengths and Weaknesses.

One way for a community to start thinking about and discussing future planning strategies is by brainstorming Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT). This process is a way for people to start thinking about ideas and it is often done more than once during the update process as it evolves and becomes more focused. The second activity at the kick-off meeting ended the night with a preliminary brainstorm about the strengths and weaknesses of the community. Participants were each given 10 sticky notes, five for strengths and five for weaknesses. They were asked to give their input on what they felt the community did well or what they wanted to enhance or protect (strengths) and then elements that they felt were missing or could be improved (weaknesses). Participants then placed their sticky note input on the wall and categorized them by topic. These notes were collected and compiled into their sorted topics to determine common themes amongst the comments.
The detailed results of this process are available below.
Activity Results
Guiding Principles




Strengths

Small
| Small Size |
| Small-scale businesses |
| L.V. is a small bedroom community centering in tradition & walkability that goes back to the 1930s |
| Small community |
| Small community |
| Small community feel - local municipality and political representation |
City Services
| Garbage and regular leaves pickup |
| Great leaf collection |
| Garbage & regular leaves pickup |
Growth
| Growing community |
| New development districts |
| Growing in a positive direction |
Government
| Educated city ocuncil |
| Educated electorate |
| DDA |
| Good historical commission and society |
| Hardworking City Council |
| City staff & City Council area available to residents |
| Leadership |
Natural Features
| Parks |
| Municipal park and Children's Garden |
| Trees and greenspaces |
| Greenspaces |
| Resiliency |
| Walkability though biased towards recreation areas |
| Trees |
| Greenspaces |
| Excellent urban forest & wildlife |
| Trees |
| Tree committee |
| Wildlife |
| Feral cat rescue & TNR |
Community
| Friendly people |
| Close community |
| Sense of community |
| Family and pet friendly |
| Proud community "Feels like home" |
| Great people |
| Community |
| Strong sense of community |
| Engaged and caring residents |
| Kind neighbors who support eachother |
| Volunteers |
| Involved community members |
| Progressive values |
| New residents show an interest in L.V. history and hope for preservation in the future |
Location
| Accessibility |
| Geographic location |
| Central location |
| Central location in metro Detroit |
| Central geographic location |
| Easy to access other areas; Downtown, northern suburbs, and east suburbs |
| Location |
| Centralized |
| Central location. Easy to get downtown, or to Novi, or Bimingham |
| Easy to get around (via car) |
| Location to Metro Detroit and surrounding neighborhoods |
| Location |
| Location and variety of businesses |
Character & Atmosphere
| Walkable neighborhoods |
| Beautiful homes and neighborhood |
| Architectural heritage |
| Residential community first |
| Curb appeal |
| Beautiful homes |
| Architectural diversity / houses |
| Diverse classic architecture in the neighborhoods |
| Character of homes / neighborhoods |
| Housing stock |
| Beautful homes and streets |
| Quiet/tranquil (depending on the day and time) on Lathrup Blvd. Architectural quality and diversity |
| Variety of homes on tree-lined streets |
| Great neighborhoods |
| Beautiful homes and gardens |
| Not a grid, not a cul-de-sac |
| Pride of ownership, well-maintained properties |
| Large residential properties |
| District architecture |
| Historical character |
| commitment to historic preservation |
| Peacefulness |
| Neighborhood feel |
Safety
| Safety |
| Low crime statistics suggest lower than nearby safe communities |
| Our own police department |
| Public safety |
Events & Activities
| Community engagement activities |
| City Activities |
| Community Activities |
| Community Events |
| I like the LVMF (music festival) bringing people together |
Diversity
| Diverse area |
| Diversity |
| Diveristy |
| Diveristy |
| Demographic diversity |
| Population diversity |
| Population diversity / acceptance |
| Diversity & acceptance |
| Diveristy |
| Diverse culture of residence |
| Community diversity |
| Diversity of neighbors |
Weaknesses

Aging Infrastructure
| Electric grid |
| Roads need to be fixed |
| Water system needs updating |
| Aging and unmaintained drainage infrastructure |
| Infrastructure, specifically sewer drainage in back yards |
| Stormwater management could be vastly improved via green infrastructure and strategic plantings |
| Lack of modern technology/current technology |
Government Finance
| Irresponsible employee salaries and perks |
| No sources of city revenue |
| High property taxes |
| Fiscal instability |
| Spending out of control |
| High taxes |
| Irresponsible spending, not revenue problem |
| City Council needs to be more fiscally responsible |
| Revenue growth challenges. City is built out. |
| Lack of or reduce revenue sharing |
| Limited economic growth |
| No new build out space |
Identity & Commercial Development
| Trying to make a "walkable" downtown. The city was never meant to have a "downtown". |
| Downtown development, no vision |
| Too many of the same businesses |
| Lack of business diversity |
| Characterless Southfield Road |
| Limited sit down restaurants |
| Unoccupied business frontage |
| Missing some amenities of a self-sufficient / contained city (groceries) |
| No Mexican restaurant in city |
| Lack of diversity in restaurants |
| Lack of identity as separate from Southfield |
| Not enough "Welcome to Lathrup Village" Signage (and signage in general) |
| Ugly main corridors |
| Overly restrictive zoning |
Division by Infrastructure
| Traffic speeding through |
| Divided neighborhoods |
| Divided by quadrants |
| Southfield Rd. & 696 separating the community |
| Connecting the four quadrants |
| Highways split into quarters |
| No speed humps (Lathrup Blvd) |
| Southfield Road |
| The big divides: Southfield Rd. & 696 Service drive |
| Hard to get around on foot, bike, or other non-motorized transportation |
Community Outlook
| Lack of broad civic participation |
| Divisiveness |
| Vicious online critics of everything |
| Short-sightedness of some residents |
| Openess to change |
| Adaptability to change |
| Trivial and petty complaints |
| People who don't appreciate the work of the mayor and council |
| Divisiveness online / social media |
| Hyper critical residents/complainers |
Preservation
| One postage stamp park for kids. Lathrup School will soon be lost forever leading to unhealthy helicopter parenting in lieu of an independent childhood. |
| Lack of respect for historic preservation. L.V. City Council & Historic District Commission. Loss of heritage and lack of support for L.V.'s traditional clubs & their charitable activities - a death of L.V.'s Lions Club in 2025 after 68 yrs |
Parks
| Neglected parks |
| Parks are outdated |
| Lack of participation in P & R |
| Unimpressive parks |
| Parks equipment not safe (older) |
| Lack of money for parks / greenspaces |
| Poor maintenance of City Hall park property |
| Insufficient maintenance of parks and city-owned grounds and greenspaces / parks |
| Lots of low-quality greenspaces - need more care and attention given to managing for quality habitat |
Private Property Maintenance
| Code enforcement |
| Tree maintenance responsibility of residents |
Government to Resident Communication
| Getting notice to everyone at once |
| lack of effective communication networks |
| communicating with residents |
| Proactive outreach for residents on costs / assessments |
| Non-transparent governance |
Schools
| Schools |